While growing up
on the range, most of our water came straight
from creeks. We’d just lie on our stomachs and
drink like animals. However, the infamous parasitic
Protozoan by the name of Giardia is more prevalent these
days...though how much seems debatable. I know a half
dozen people today who drink untreated surface water
in the western US and BC. Some people are no doubt more
immune than others though I highly suspect Giardia is
not as widespread as often believed…at least in
truly remote areas.
That said, I am not recommending
you test my suspicions and drink from the source. Depending
on the location, there may be other contaminates in
the water besides Giardia. These might include bacteria,
viruses and believe it or not, chemicals. For those
reasons, I recommend that you treat your water. How
though is up to you based on the level of protection
you believe is needed. Below is
an overview of the most popular methods used by lightweight
travelers.
Bottle
filters
The bottle filter is one of the best inventions to come
out of the outdoor industry. It is simply a water bottle
with a replaceable filter cartridge under the lid. To
use, take off the lid/filter, dip the bottle in the
river, replace the lid/filter and squeeze/suck for potable
water (you'll frustrate/tire quickly
if you don't squeeze while sucking). You can
even do this while in the boat. Staying hydrated has
never been easier.
 |
| Note
the duct tape on this bottle filter. I carry it
in several places including on person wrapped around
a lighter. |
No pumping, no extra water bottles
to carry, simple, always available and only slightly
heavier than a conventional water bottle. The only drawback
is that they will clog rather quickly in silty and or
brown water. For reasonably clear water though, these
bottles are tops for all-out convenience!
Most bottle filters
only take care of Protozoans and bacterias. If you're
worried about viruses and like the bottle
filter concept, make sure to get a purifying bottle
filter (Katadyn
makes the most popular). Just keep in mind that
purifying bottle filters use iodine and will leave your
water tasting as such (their carbon
filters only reduce the taste). Some can tolerate
this while others can not stomach it. If you want to
purify without imparting a nasty taste to the water,
you'll have to boil, filter with the First Need or use
the Steripen. More on those methods below.
Also, though some bottle filters
may look identical to others, not all are equal in the
taste department. After using several, I have come to
prefer the Aquamira...though
I have noticed some taste inconsistencies in their filter
cartridges too. Changes in manufacturing, materials
and suppliers can alter the tastes to any filter at
any time so you may have to experiment with different
brands if your taste buds are picky.
Pump filters & purifiers
Filtering and purifying with hand held pump units are
the most common methods of water treatment. The two
types should not be confused though. While pump filters
(often called micro filters)
and purifiers both have filter cartridges and are used
the same way, they do not provide equal amounts of protection.
A filter filters out sediment, protozoa and bacteria
while the purifier does that plus destroys viruses.
In the not so distant past, all
but one of the pump purifiers suitable for backpacking
used iodine for viruses. Today, the only pump purifier
remaining on the market is that one not using iodine,
the First Need
by General Ecology. It
uses what the company calls a “unique, proprietary
Structured Matrix chemical-free technology”. While
a little heavier and bulkier than some pump filters
in the backpacking class, it is currently the only way
to get both filtered and “purified” water
without using chemicals or resorting to a burdening
Steripen/pump filter combination.
Filter or purifier, the one you
choose depends on the level of protection you believe
is needed. Most backcountry travelers in the western
US and British Columbia use a filter with no additional
viral protection. However, traveling to different parts
of the country or abroad may present additional risks.
You make the call.
| Chemicals
in backcountry water? How could that be? Believe
it or not, there are several ways chemicals
can end up in the backcountry water you are cooking
with & drinking. One route is via air masses
as noted below in No single raindrop believes
it is to blame for the flood. Other avenues
are herbicides used to kill poisonous plants in
campsites & various chemicals from upstream
development, ranching & remote
marijuana growing operations. |
It should also be noted that some
manufacturers claim their filters (including
some bottle filters) or purifiers "reduce"
"some" chemicals. Considering the options,
or lack of, this may offer a small piece of mind when
paddling where chemicals might be in the water. Yes,
one is probably far more likely to get struck by lightning
than die or even get sick from acute chemical poisoning
in the backcountry. However, there are other and far
more complex issues associated with low dose chemical
exposures that are beyond the scope of this page. For
further reading, click here.
Tips:
- Always search for the cleanest
looking water that is not moving fast or at all.
The faster the water is moving, the more particles
there will be suspended and the more you’ll
unnecessarily put in your filter or purifier's filter
cartridge.
- Use a prefilter in muddy or
silty water. They can be backflushed in the field
and will keep your main filter cleaner longer.
- It’s a good idea to let
muddy or silty water settle several hours or overnight
before filtering/purifying. Instead of carrying
a special bucket for this, you can fill the stern
of an empty kayak and stand it upright against a
rock, tree, or steep bank. Do this as soon as you
get to camp so you can filter later that evening
and again the next morning.
Besides the General
Ecology First Need purifier, other reputable filter
makers are MSR
(Sweetwater) and Katadyn
(PUR).
Boiling
While boiling is recognized as being a surefire method
of dealing with protozoa, bacteria and viruses, it has
several shortcomings. Boiling will not remove chemicals;
the water will taste flat (a pinch of
salt will help); it's time consuming; it takes
a lot of fuel; no sediments
are removed; and lastly, unless you like your water
hot, you’ll have to wait until it cools. Even
then, the water will only reach the ambient air temperature.
However, other than chemicals that
could potentially be in the water, none of these weaknesses
are a problem when cooking a meal that requires boiled
water. In these regards, boiling is actually
the preferred route as you'll get food in you mouth
quicker and be saving your filter or purifier's filter
cartridge along the way. The boiling treats
the water so no need to filter or purify. Just dip your
pan in the creek/river, boil and eat!
According to the CDC,
one should boil vigorously for 1 minute at altitudes
under 6,562' and 3 minutes above.
Chemically treating
There are oodles of chemical treatments on the market
and they all share the same trait that makes them so
desirable to some; lightness. When in tablet form, enough
for the typical self-support trip would weigh no more
than a stick of gum. Additionally, there’s little
cash outlay for the occasional user and there's nothing
to break. That’s where the advantages end though.
These chemicals don’t remove other chemicals or
sediments nor do they provide instantaneous treatment.
Best case scenario is about 30 minutes and to effectively
treat some microbes in cold water, the wait can be up
to four hours!
Furthermore, though it
may surprise many, two of the most commonly known chemicals,
iodine and chlorine, have limited effectiveness (in
recommended doses) on Giardia, Cryptosporidium
and other coccidian parasites, the very contaminates
most likely to be in surface water. Iodine’s
lack of effectiveness on Protozoans is well covered
in Military
Medicine and the department of SWES
at the University of Arizona goes as far as recommending
a different form of treatment altogether. If that wasn’t
enough, chemicals impart unnatural and often times unpleasant
tastes and some of the byproducts left over from the
disinfection process are suspected to be or are known
to be unhealthy. Little is even known about some of
these byproducts for they have
not been adequately researched.
The
following was taken from a packet of popular chemical
water treatment tablets.
DANGER.
Corrosive. Causes irreversible eye damage &
skin burns. Harmful if absorbed through the skin.
Harmful if swallowed. Do not get in eyes, on skin
or on clothing. Wear protective eyewear (goggles,
face shield or safety glasses, protective clothing
& rubber gloves). Wash thouroughly with soap
& water after handling. Remove contaminated
clothing & wash before reuse.
ENVIRONMENTAL
HAZARDS
This product is toxic
to fish & other aquatic organisms.
|
Considering all the downsides to
treating water with chemicals, there will always be
a few who simply can not resist the obvious diminutiveness
and weight savings these treatments provide. For those,
Chlorine Dioxide might be the answer. Chlorine Dioxide
doesn't treat any faster than iodine but it does take
care of the microbes iodine doesn’t and the taste
is not as unpleasant...though I find it remindful of
some city tap water. If ones taste buds have never been
exposed to pure spring or well water, they may not notice
the difference. If one relishes for the taste of unadulterated
water straight from the earth, I'd suggest another route
of treatment.
If Chlorine Dioxide is for you,
it is available in convenient tablet form from Aquamira,
Katadyn
and Potable Aqua.
One more
chemical treatment method getting some press is the
MSR
MIOX Purifier Pen. It's about the size of a jumbo
cigar and works by creating brine out of untreated water
and salt, then passing a small
electrical charge through the solution creating a dose
of mixed oxidants. Basically, you add water, shake,
select the correct button, pour solution into bottle
of untreated water, check the "safety indicator
strip" and wait. Besides all the steps and the
fact it is a
battery driven electronic device,
the wait time is about the same as iodine and I have
read a number of reports saying the treated water tastes
like swimming pool water. If
one was planning to treat a lot of water over long periods,
and was set on using chemicals, the MIOX pen would be
a cost effective way. Otherwise,
it seems like an overly complicated way of achieving
the same as simply dropping a Chlorine
Dioxide tablet in the water.
Steripen ultraviolet
(UV) light purifier
The Steripen
handheld ultraviolet light purifier is an intriguing
method of water treatment. Compared to the conventional
pump purifier, the Steripen units require no setup or
cleaning and are considerably lighter and more compact.
And while not as light as chemical tablets, the Steripen
does in 90 seconds what can take chemicals up to 4 hours
to accomplish and without affecting the taste. No chemicals
needed and Steripen claims eradication of protozoa,
bacteria and viruses. Its UV light purifies by destroying
the DNA of these microbes which prevents them form reproducing.
Operation is simple. Basically, you take the lamp cover
off, turn it on, stick it in your bottle of water and
stir until the light turns off. Though this technology
is relatively new to the backcountry scene, it has been
used for years in research labs, hospitals, bottling
plants and municipalities.
 |
The 3.6
ounce Steripen Adventurer purifies 12 gallons at
90 seconds/quart on a single set of disposable batteries
or 9 gallons with rechargeables. |
Now for its pitfalls. The Steripen
is controlled by an onboard computer which means batteries
and other complexities. Its lamp, once the cover is
off, could be vulnerable too. While it is made from
strong optical grade quartz, it would be wise to not
drop it. Also, it doesn't remove sediment or chemicals
and the murkier the water is, the less effective it
becomes. That said, the Steripen may be an excellent
choice for vigilant people who are wanting a super light,
fast, compact and convenient way of purifying relatively
clear water without the use of chemicals.
Bisphenol
A (BPA) leaching into food and beverages
Bisphenol-A (BPA) is an endocrine disrupting chemical
used in plastic products, including some kinds of water
bottles, baby bottles, and food storage and heating
containers. It is also used in the lining of metal food
cans and in certain plastics used in children’s
toys amongst other things. Though BPA didn’t reach
mainstream media headlines to any great extent before
2008, it was first understood to be toxic in the late
30’s. By accident, it was discovered to leach
into liquids from polycarbonate in 1987. Then again,
by accident, it was discovered to mimic estrogen in
1993. By 1997, BPA had been linked to multiple health
issues and the intervening years saw a development of
science that established a new paradigm for our understanding
of chemical toxicity. This has prompted a number of
countries and states to limit the use of BPA. Within
the manufacturing world, Nalgene, one of the most recognized
names in the outdoor industry, has voluntarily chosen
to phase out their production line of polycarbonate
containers containing BPA. Walmart, CVS and Toys 'R
Us also announced plans to discontinue baby bottles
containing BPA. Other companies are following suit.
 |
27 oz
food-grade stainless steel Klean
Kanteen going on 5 yrs of daily use. Classy,
durable & no chance for chemical leaching or
imparted flavors with any beverage, warm or cold.
In a pinch, these non-painted versions can even
be used to heat beverages or soups in, without
the lid of course. |
Despite that and scientific studies
implicating BPA in a range of human health problems
that are on the rise, as a whole, policymakers in the
US have either been slow to act or have done little
to limit its usage. This is due largely to a regulatory
process that has essentially been unchanged since 1976.
It puts the costly and time-consuming burden of proof
on the EPA rather than chemical companies and our administrators
have not provided the EPA with sufficient resources
and staffing to thoroughly address these issues. To
quote the US Government Accountability Office, “Little
is known about the risks posed by many of the chemicals
to which millions of consumers and workers are exposed.
Although the amount of exposure to a chemical can vary
greatly depending on its use, the EPA's information
on chemical use is often scarce, incomplete, or outdated”.
Minimizing exposure to
BPA. In terms of kayaking, this is easy to
do by avoiding the use of any plastic with the recycling
code #7 or the letters “PC”. Plastics
marked with the recycling code #1, 2, 4 or 5 do not
contain BPA, however, this does not mean they will
not leach other chemicals. Your
safest bet is to avoid plastic altogether when it
comes to beverages and liquidity food. Although
most chemicals in the culinary field are considered
"safe", that's generally not because they've
been proven safe, but rather they have not been proven
to be unsafe. It
must also be remembered that hot foods and beverages
increase leaching. For this reason, I have stopped
preparing my freezedried meals in their pouches. Instead,
I pour the contents in to the pan of boiling water,
cover and let sit. Same concept and same results but
with a pan that must be washed. While not
as as convenient, convenience in the contemporary
sense is rarely conducive to well being in the long
run.
Additionally, it would also be
wise to use metal utensils, pots (with
no anti stick coatings), bowls and water bottles
made from food-grade materials and without linings.
KISS. Keep it super simple.
For further reading, visit
the EWG website and
type “BPA” into its search function. Additional
BPA info can be found on Our
Stolen Future’s website. For information on
the U.S. chemical regulatory process, visit the U.S.
GAO website and search “TSCA” (Toxic
Substance Control Act).
No
single raindrop believes it is to blame for the
flood. Some of the most toxic chemicals
known to man are carried on air masses and deposited
in places we assume to be the most pristine. Just
a few examples would be the well-documented *struggle
the Inuit peoples of the Arctic are having
with dioxins; the
agricultural chemicals and other compounds found
at high elevations in many North American national
parks; and very high levels of mercury in
the waters of southern Idaho near some of the
most remote self-support runs in the Lower 48.
It is unknown how these chemicals may or may not
affect the self-supporter. That isn’t
the point though. The point is this:
never assume you’re in a ecosystem unaffected
by mans actions. Also, as harsh as it is, remember
that we contribute to this issue each time we
support the PVC industry, eat non-organically
grown food and turn the light on.
*Watch
a video trailer of "Invisible", a documentary
of Inuit mothers whose bodies are contaminated
with chemicals. Click here.
Just
in, Feb 26, 2008: National Park Service
overview and announcement of the Western Airborne
Contaminants Assessment Project. Click
here. |
General tips
- If using anything but a bottle
filter, consider taking
the largest water bottle you can realistically take.
Otherwise, you'll have to take the time to dig your
system out of the kayak and treat water in between
camps to stay hydrated throughout the day.
- For a convenient camp measuring
cup, graduations can be applied to your bottle with
a permanent marker.
- If you are launching anywhere
below human development, whether it’s a farm,
single cabin, small village or ranch, assume the water
is contaminated with undesirables, including chemicals.
While some methods may disinfect the water fine, your
safest bet is to treat water from small side streams/springs.
For more in depth reading on water treatment
options, check out this
excellent page on the Zen Backpacking site.
1.25.10
|